 |
| Reference: http://digitalblasphemy.com/graphics/previews/stringtheory2_preview.jpg |
Good day! It has been 5 months since I first started this Blog. I know this is not an amazing blog, compared to the most popular ones. But this is my own little attempt to reach out and help people see some of the things that I see. Put here some of the exciting things that I've learned and known. And there is no turning back!
This is also for my kids. When they grow up, I will show them this blog and hopefully they would be inspired by the awesome reality that science has shown me and the wonderful future it will bring to us. I might not be around when the time comes that we could fully feel the true scope of what science and technology has to offer, but they will. I will continue to put here links, books, articles, websites, pictures and videos from different sources.
For those who have viewed and read this page and supported my blog by showing it to others...MY SINCEREST THANKS.
Here is the link I viewed yesterday. This is about a known but mysterious hypothesis about String Theory. I am new to this and I will try to fully understand what this is and how it affects us as humans.
The video is a lecture between two prominent scientists. Brian Greene (Theoretical Physicist and String Theorist) and cosmologist Lawrence Strauss.
The link below covers the basics of what String Theory is and covers more websites about the Topic:
http://www.nucleares.unam.mx/~alberto/physics/string.html
You can also try complex terms by reading the Wikipedia article here.
This beautifully constructed article by Alberto Güijosa gives us some basic understanding behind the principles of String Theory.
We live in a wonderfully complex universe, and we are curious about it by nature. Time and again we have wondered--- why are we here? Where did we and the world come from? What is the world made of? It is our privilege to live in a time when enormous progress has been made towards finding some of the answers. String theory is our most recent attempt to answer the last (and part of the second) question.
So, what is the world made of? Ordinary matter is made of atoms, which are in turn made of just three basic components: electrons whirling around a nucleus composed of neutrons and protons. The electron is a truly fundamental particle (it is one of a family of particles known as leptons), but neutrons and protons are made of smaller particles, known as quarks. Quarks are, as far as we know, truly elementary.
Our current knowledge about the subatomic composition of the universe is summarized in what is known as the Standard Model of particle physics. It describes both the fundamental building blocks out of which the world is made, and the forces through which these blocks interact. There are twelve basic building blocks. Six of these are quarks--- they go by the interesting names of up, down, charm, strange, bottom and top. (A proton, for instance, is made of two up quarks and one down quark.) The other six are leptons--- these include the electron and its two heavier siblings, the muon and the tauon, as well as three neutrinos.
There are four fundamental forces in the universe: gravity, electromagnetism, and the weak and strong nuclear forces. Each of these is produced by fundamental particles that act as carriers of the force. The most familiar of these is the photon, a particle of light, which is the mediator of electromagnetic forces. (This means that, for instance, a magnet attracts a nail because both objects exchange photons.) The graviton is the particle associated with gravity. The strong force is carried by eight particles known as gluons. Finally, the weak force is transmitted by three particles, the W+, the W- , and the Z.The behavior of all of these particles and forces is described with impeccable precision by the Standard Model, with one notable exception: gravity. For technical reasons, the gravitational force, the most familiar in our every day lives, has proven very difficult to describe microscopically. This has been for many years one of the most important problems in theoretical physics-- to formulate a quantum theory of gravity.
In the last few decades, string theory has emerged as the most promising candidate for a
microscopic theory of gravity. And it is infinitely more ambitious than that: it attempts to provide a complete, unified, and consistent description of the fundamental structure of our universe. (For this reason it is sometimes, quite arrogantly, called a 'Theory of Everything').
The essential idea behind string theory is this: all of the different 'fundamental '
particles of the Standard Model are really just different manifestations of one basic
object: a string. How can that be? Well, we would ordinarily picture an electron, for
instance, as a point with no internal structure. A point cannot do anything but move. But, if string theory is correct, then under an extremely powerful 'microscope' we would realize that the electron is not really a point, but a tiny loop of string. A string can do
something aside from moving--- it can oscillate in different ways. If it oscillates a
certain way, then from a distance, unable to tell it is really a string, we see an electron. But if it oscillates some other way, well, then we call it a photon, or a quark, or a ... you get the idea. So, if string theory is correct, the entire world is made of strings!
Perhaps the most remarkable thing about string theory is that such a simple idea works--- it is possible to derive (an extension of) the Standard Model (which has been verified
experimentally with incredible precision) from a theory of strings. But it should also be
said that, to date, there is no direct experimental evidence that string theory itself is
the correct description of Nature. This is mostly due to the fact that string theory is
still under development. We know bits and pieces of it, but we do not yet see the whole
picture, and we are therefore unable to make definite predictions. In recent years many
exciting developments have taken place, radically improving our understanding of what the theory is.
Reference:
http://www.nucleares.unam.mx/~alberto/physics/string.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/String_theory
